Most PopularRecent Blog Posts
National Features >
Letters for November 29, 2001The weekly paper’s burdenPublished on November 29, 2001Jen eats: Marc Smilen Name-calling for fun and political gain: Another ass-kickin' Israelite heard from: Scott and Barbara Fantell An affront to journalists everywhere: In my years as an international photojournalist and writer, I covered riots, war, and way too many disasters. That experience informed my belief that her article was unfair both to journalists and to the public. At 49 years old, I may be closer to Dan Rather's age than Eastman's. I've learned that we communicators are merely and gloriously human, and our job is to present readers, viewers, and listeners with as much information about -- and interpretation of -- events as possible. When we are successful we involve the senses, not just the intellect. Citizens turn to seasoned journalists to get not only the facts but also the flavor of the event. Sometimes it's communicated through a vivid photo. Sometimes it's through a voice breaking with emotion. Who among my generation and older will ever forget Walter Cronkite's voice as he announced the death of President Kennedy? So to criticize Dan Rather for crying or Diane Sawyer for expressing her feelings is simply unfair. Readers and viewers want and deserve more than a teletype version of the news. I am a Democrat, a liberal, and no fan of President Bush. But to have denigrated our president by using the nickname "Dubya" during this time of true national crisis was to trivialize the trauma of our nation. On the same morning I read Eastman's piece, I also read a Herald page 2 story by Lenny Savino ("Red Flags All Over the Place") on how the warning signs of impending disaster were ignored by the intelligence community, which relied on past history to form its view of future risk. Now, there was a story worth reading. It shed new light. In fact, it was the kind of piece I would have expected brilliant investigative reporters at New Times to write. Sorry, New Times, but instead of brilliance, I felt Eastman's article was mostly a waste of critical thinking. Pete Silver
write your comment
|