By Chris Joseph
By Chris Joseph
By Allie Conti
By Chuck Strouse
By Chris Joseph
By Chris Joseph
By Allie Conti
By Kyle Swenson
For 18 years of my life, I was homeless. I was addicted to alcohol and crack cocaine. I committed crimes that were neither violent nor profitable; they were crimes of survival and addiction. For charges that included petty larceny, loitering, public intoxication, resisting arrest without violence, and possession of one marijuana cigarette, I am now labeled a convicted felon.
For the past five years, I have been a model citizen. This is not a boast. Members of my community will stand by me and attest to this. These people include city officials, CEOs, professional people, and ordinary citizens. My life has changed completely.
I came from a broken home and started to experiment with drugs and alcohol at an early age. I became a full-blown alcoholic and drug addict by the time I was 21 years old. From that point on, my life held no promise, purpose, or direction. I lived day to day in poverty and despair.
I enrolled in a program at the Broward Outreach Center on December 28, 1998, my birthday. I wanted a new start on life. I came to terms with my past and decided to live for my future instead.
Not long ago, I graduated from Sheridan Technical Center in Hollywood with a certificate as an administration assistant. I then went on to college prep classes. I am now a second-year business major. And I have become a homeowner and am employed by the BOC as a volunteer coordinator.
I have faced many challenges and have overcome many obstacles, but I can change only myself. I cannot change the misconceptions people harbor when they hear the word felon. I have gone beyond my debt to society, and I am now giving society my experience as a teacher. I travel to area high schools and inform the students of the consequences of wrong choices and tell them that they must be in control of their lives. But more than that, I teach them that even if you make mistakes in life, it is never too late to change.
James L. Coleman
Watch out, John Poindexter; we have your number: Great article, dudes. I worked for the ACLU last year in downtown Fort Lauderdale on the voting-rights restoration project (abcnews.go.com
Funny how the "Gov" takes care of "his own," isn't it? This clown helped the government cover up a major crime and is free to help select the Republican of his choice, where the folks who are just workin' stiffs get the shaft. Kind of says it all.
Isn't it ironic that Adm. John Poindexter, a felon, was recently given control of assembling the most powerful database ever conceived, at the Pentagon, and the object of your article can't get a simple license?
Form a committee? Tag, you're it: In what promised to be an insightful look into supposed racist activities in the City of Plantation, Bob Norman's December 26 piece ("Down on the Plantation III") levels one personal snipe after another, buttressed only by innuendo and rumor, at past and present city officials.
Mr. Norman fails to recognize the current administration's successful community revitalization efforts along the State Road 441 corridor. More troubling, other than champion the calls of two unsuccessful council candidates (Messrs. Hillier and Petrocelli), Norman fails to direct his heretofore astute journalistic craft toward an examination of the critics' claims. As an example, Norman promotes Mr. Rico Petrocelli as a viable "outside" candidate for the Plantation City Council. Yet, Norman does not inquire why Mr. Petrocelli, as a member of the PAL executive committee, failed to exercise his considerable authority to remedy the supposedly "racist" conduct.
Furthermore, it has always been my understanding that all PAL tryouts are posted in the Sun-Sentinel and the Herald. Perhaps Mr. Norman would care to attack the circulation practices of these local papers as being racially biased?
Moreover, the article fails to provide detailed information from those community members (like myself) involved in city [youth] sponsored sporting activities -- who consistently provide transportation to and from sporting events for kids whose parents can't make it to a game. I never saw this as a "racial" issue but rather as a parent-working issue.
I would have been more interested in Mr. Norman's series had he actually provided a solution to the supposed problem, such as a community action committee, workshop or the like involving all interested Plantation citizens. The article could have spurred Plantation to really determine whether a problem exists, and if so, how best to fix it. Instead, Norman simply acted as a front for two failed candidates who would apparently like to fire up a portion of the community with rumors and innuendo. It's like shouting "Fire!" in a crowded room.
Wives, don't let your husbands grow up to be cowboys: I truly was bothered by Rebekah Gleaves' December 12 article on the Pynk Pages ("In the Pynk"). Has the human race degraded so that now there has to be a book on where to get a prostitute? How can this man's wife be agreeable to such behavior? And his daughter? It amazes me to think that people consider this behavior OK.
First of all, I think this man has some real sexual issues. Counseling, instead of a book on hookers and where to find them, might help. Or how about a book on morals for married men looking for outside relationships? Or how about a book that would guide men back to their marital commitment and teach them to build their relationships with their spouses -- a commitment they took a vow to fulfill?
How about single people trying to learn more about themselves and why they would pay for sex? Maybe give them a book to help them grow in other areas of their lives. How about the hookers? How can they truly feel good about themselves? Is it really all about money? How sad that this has become so acceptable and that a wife and daughter agree to such a thing just for the money. America, how sad... let's clean up our acts and become responsible adults instead of just people who lust for money and sex.
Cindy Falco Di Corrado
You all deserve Harvey's bile: How outrageous for letter writer James H. Batmasian to opine that Congressman Robert Wexler says and does things to "get as many Jewish and other votes as possible" (Letters, December 5). Does Batmasian know Wexler? Doubtful; otherwise, he wouldn't trash Wexler by saying, "Mr. Wexler needs to turn his back on his own personal beliefs and simply support everything that Israel does, right or wrong."
In fact, Mr. Wexler's personal beliefs are, 99 percent of the time, in accord with Israel's attempts to protect itself from terrorist Arab butchers. And Wexler agrees with Israel that the big problem is how to get the Arabs who occupy the land won by Israel in 1967 and 1973 to stop trying to exterminate the Jewish state. He's been consistent in these matters. He's never wavered in his opinions; so why accuse him falsely of doing same?
In another matter, to Stacy Davids, Herb Siegel, et al., and the other 92,000 moronic schmucks who voted for Ralph Nader for president: You helped elect that right-wing putz, "Dubya." Are you happy that we're all really fucked now? No environment! No help for people against big business! Right-wing fascist courts, etc.! Thanks for nothing -- nothing left of our country by 2008, that is.