By Michael E. Miller
By Allie Conti
By Keegan Hamilton and Francisco Alvarado
By Jake Rossen
By Allie Conti
By Kyle Swenson
By Chris Joseph
By Michael E. Miller
Matlock, who says he learned about the G-spot from medical textbooks, has performed the procedure about 250 times now; he´s seeing a 65 percent return rate, he says. He´s happy to share his knowledge -- so long as doctors use his kits. They must purchase a minimum of six kits at $450 each, with a suggested mark up to $1,850. And, oh yeah. Doctors should use collagen precisely because it´s short-lasting. ¨What if the patient doesn´t like it?¨
In truth, the extra step means that Matlock makes more money, selling two shots instead of one over six months, he concedes. ¨It´s a business,¨ Matlock says. ¨I have an MBA from Irvine.¨ As for doctors who are using Restylane instead of his trademarked G-Shot, Matlock says, ¨I wish I knew who they were so I can sue them!¨
It´s the sort of dispute that keeps ethics professors in business.
Jeffrey Spike, a bioethicist at Florida State University´s College of Medicine, says that the G-spot is ¨like a folk tale.¨
¨You can prove that something exists if you find it, but if you don´tfind it, that doesn´t prove that it doesn´texist,¨ Spike says. The G-spot belongs in the same category as angels and unicorns, he insists. At best, Spike believes, doctors who allegedly enhance G-spots are profiting off women´s insecurities. At worst, they´re engaging in ¨something more like medical fraud.¨
Terence Hines, a neuroscientist at Pace University in New York, is blunter: ¨Sheer quackery!¨ he says of G-spot amplification. ¨I´ve never heard such nonsense in my life!¨ Hines, who has debunked theories about UFOs and reincarnation, looked into the reality of the G-spot in 2001 and published a scientific article in the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology.
Hines found ¨no evidence whatsoever for a G-spot.¨ If there were a highly sensitive spot in the vagina wall, he postulates, it would have to be surrounded by ¨lots and lots of neurons.¨ No one has ever found such bundles, he says, even though ¨every inch of the vagina has been looked at histologically¨ (meaning thin slices of tissue have been examined under microscopes). ¨The anatomical evidence is simply not there.¨ Ditto for the historical evidence. ¨The Kama Sutra doesn´t even mention the G-spot. What? Did it just evolve in 1980?¨
Hines contends that medical studies making G-spot discoveries were done with ¨something like 12 females,¨ who knew they were supposed to be looking for the G-spot and were therefore more inclined to find it. That approach is what scientists call ¨demand characteristics.¨ Even then, only half actually found it, Hines says.
At least two female professors, though, challenge the debunkers: Rebecca Chalker, a sexologist at Pace, and Beverly Whipple, a PhD and RN at Rutgers, have written books insisting that the G-spot exists. In fact, it was Whipple´s 1982 book that sparked massive public attention. That´s the point, Hines says: everyone arguing for it has something to sell. There´s even another ¨Doctor G-Spot¨ out there, a California researcher named John Perry who advertises a range of sex toys and instruction manuals on his website.
Whipple, reached at home in New Jersey, believes that a G-spot exists, but is skeptical about enhancing it, because no double-blind placebo-controlled studies have been conducted.
Both Whipple and Hines suggest that women be wary of the risks of G-spot amplification. At http://thegshot.com (Matlock´s site), a host of potential side effects are listed.
The Food and Drug Administration said that it had not approved any fillers for G-spot amplification, or for injection into the anterior vaginal wall, nor had it received any complaints. A spokesperson for Restylane would not promote the vaginal injections, saying only that the product has been ¨FDA approved for injection into naso-labial folds -- the smile lines that run from your nose to the corners of your mouth.¨ Using products for purposes beyond what they were approved for is somewhat common in medicine; it´s referred to as ¨off-label use.¨
As for Benjamin, he has no fears about performing G-spot injections despite the lack of peer-reviewed studies or clinical trials. He considers it such a low-risk procedure that ¨I don´t really have to do a double-blind study and review 10,000 people.¨ After so many years in business, he has come to trust his patients´ testimonials. And if it makes them happier, he says, ¨That´s what life´s about, right?
¨This is one of those things that´s at its dawn of being,¨ Benjamin sums up airily. For now, he may be perceived as ¨a little bit out there´¨ but soon, he predicts, G-spot shots will be as common as boob jobs. He´s just pioneering them. ¨To be immodest,¨ he smiles, ¨I´m good -- and I´m gutsy.¨