Pit Bulls Banned in Miami Find Refuge in Broward and Palm Beach Counties

Back in February 1989, a 7-year-old girl named Melissa Moreira was walking home on SW 18th Terrace in Miami. She had spent the evening shopping with her family. As she walked by a neighbor's home, a pit bull ran at her and leaped.

The dog tore apart the girl's face and arms as she screamed. It then savaged her mother and grandmother before a neighbor shot it four times in the head.

The animal left the little girl in critical condition. She survived only after extensive reconstructive surgery to her face.

Soon after that attack, the Miami-Dade County Commission banned all pit bulls. The ban was probably the first such countywide measure in the nation. Since then, thousands of pit bulls have been killed in a drab building near the Palmetto Expressway. In 2008, the county confiscated 802 pit bulls and euthanized more than 650. Workers every month halt scores of animals' hearts with an overdose of barbiturates, then cart them en masse out the back door.

The Miami-Dade ban effectively began a pit bull exodus northward. Neither Broward nor Palm Beach has such a ban, and dozens of dog owners have fled here over the years with their dogs just to avoid the law.

National animal groups from the Humane Society to the American Veterinary Medical Association have been unable to get the ban overturned. But thanks to a tiny 57-year-old woman with a short haircut and a paw print tattooed on her left wrist, that may soon change. Dahlia Canes led a group that won an unprecedented legal victory this past March. And now she has hired a lawyer and plans to mount a lawsuit that might overturn the measure. "The ban doesn't work," she says. "It's insane that we're taking them away and killing them."

The catchall term "pit bull" actually refers to at least three common breeds of dog — the American Pit Bull Terrier, the American Staffordshire Terrier, and the Staffordshire Bull Terrier. All three probably descended from bulldogs bred in England in the 1800s for "bull baiting" — brutal bull-versus-canine blood matches. The sport was banned in the 1830s, so the hardy animals were bred for dog fights instead.

Hundreds came to America with Irish and English immigrants. By the early 1900s, pit bulls were among the nation's most popular breeds. The Little Rascals' dog, Petey, was a pit bull. So was Sgt. Stubby, a beloved WWI mascot who earned dozens of medals in the European trenches with the 102nd Infantry.

Pit bulls didn't become pariahs until the past two decades, after well-publicized, stomach-churning attacks. The one on Melissa Moreira brought out the anti-pit bull forces, including the Miami Herald, which came out in support of the Miami measure. Before an April 4, 1989, vote, Moreira's mother tearfully asked Miami-Dade commissioners: "Who in this room is going to bring my child back to the way she was?" It passed unanimously.

But it didn't take long for the law's problems to become obvious.

One owner chained 16 pit bulls to a tree in a Miramar field and left them to starve rather than face the $500 fines for each dog. A month after the ban was approved, the Herald flip-flopped and wrote a scathing editorial demanding its repeal. The next year, Florida's Legislature passed a statewide prohibition against "breed-specific" dog laws. Miami-Dade's rule, however, was grandfathered in.

The law has plenty of supporters, including PETA. In 2001, the Centers for Disease Control reported that pit bulls had killed 66 people in the '80s and '90s, twice as many as any other kind of dog.

But that statistic is nonsense, says Adam Goldfarb, a Humane Society spokesman. No one has shown that breedwide bans reduce pit bull assaults. He contends that the laws are expensive and almost impossible to enforce. Thousands of pit bull owners flaunt the law every day just by walking their dogs in Miami-Dade. "We don't believe any one breed of dog is inherently more dangerous than any other breed," Goldfarb says.

Miami's ban has met its most ardent — and dangerous critic — in Canes. She fled to Miami in 1959 with her family at age 6 when her father, a member of Batista's regime, was forced from Cuba. Her love for animals goes back to her homeland, where she once spent her $12 allowance on a mule.

In 2003, the paralegal spotted a stray dog while driving on NW 32nd Avenue in Miami. When she opened the door, the mud-colored mutt leaped into the car and laid her head on Canes' lap. Though a friend in the backseat shouted, "Watch out, it's a pit bull!" Canes was in love and named her Chocolate.

But soon, Animal Services discovered the dog. Canes sent Chocolate to live in Broward, beginning her quest to overturn the pit bull ban.

Since then, Canes has adopted dozens of pit bulls and founds homes for them in Broward or other places where the canines are legal.

She's also met people like Pierre Bahri, who have moved north to save their pit bulls. Bahri, an art gallery worker, packed up in December after an Animal Control officer gave him 48 hours to remove two pit bulls from his Wynwood home. He broke his lease and moved to Hollywood. "I love my dogs," he says, "like they're my kids."

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • Joie 01/01/2012 8:30:00 PM

    Even though your spelling is really bad...your heart is really good!!! It's true..this is MURDER..of INNOCENT ANIMALS!!! Their ONLY CRIME was to be born as an AMERICAN PIT BULL TERRIER!!!! I have loved and raised APBTs for 30 years! NEVER had 1 bite a person..or another dog!!!! I myself was savagly ATTACKED by a ROTTWEILER..and it was supposedly a 'sweet' dog. NO BREED of dog should ever be BANNED!!! Onlt the specific DOGS that commit horrendous attacks..or are found to be VICIOUS..should be banned. And MOST OF THE TIME..it is in fact..the OWNER who should be PUNISHED!!!!!!  

  • summer and isibella 05/29/2011 12:00:00 PM

    its no fair that because those pasific dogs killed and hert people u kill all of the pitbulls in miami what happens if u killed manny sweet dogs u guys are murders u should be put in jail me and 50 of my friends had a plain when we got older but u guys ruend it we were going to move to miami have alot of dogs including pitbulls  and we wanted to work at the a.s.p.c.a so now this is affecting everyone now the a.s.p.c.a lost 50 workers i hope u lozers are happy i hope you kow that what u did was crule and unusial oooooooo and ask the aspca this if they love animals then y would they go through with this they should actualy get workers who care about animals and stick up for them like if i was there and they were banding pitbulls i would stick up for the breed. i would take a gun shot to my head and die for my pitbulls and there puppies i dont know about u pople but i care about this bread more than eney thing.......i have this on picture as my screan saver it says  in memory of all people killed by ignorance and fear and has a pic of a pitbull with wings and u guys are incoraging that now people r going to think its ok to kill animals thanks alot

  • 大阪 Ӡ 12/14/2009 12:08:00 PM

    大阪 デリヘル 中古コピー機 大阪 デリヘル 大阪 デリヘル 大阪 デリヘル 日本語ラップ 日本語ラップ MIX CD 通販 中古コピー機 中古コピー機 漫画 おすすめ マンガ

  • Christopher Silva 10/14/2009 4:09:00 AM

    1,800 pits killed? So, who's the murderer now? I'm a recent pit owner. And I love him so much. He's like family. And he's the sweetest thing. My mother and daughter even taken a liking to him. I live in Palm Beach and this law doesn't affect me. But I'm shocked to hear so many pits killed from such a horrible law. Dogs, any dogs, are like children Some are born bad. But mostly are born good. But are turned bad by bad parenting. And to those would left Miami for your loved ones. I applaud your loyalty. Thanks for saving those pits. And you know one thing, this law almost sounds like when the Nazis wanted to exterminate the Jew. Pit owners have to go in hiding, pit owners flee, and the massacre of many innocent pits. And now, they won't change it cause of politics. They should punish the owner is the dog is overly aggresive. Cause good people don't have bad dogs. That's what i believe.

  • hung 08/18/2009 11:14:00 AM

    高収入 アルバイト 高収入 アルバイト 風俗 風俗 美少女ゲーム ソープランド 出会い 出会い デリヘル すすきの ソープラン ド 新宿 ソープランド 千葉 ソープランド 埼玉 ソープランド 神奈川 ソープランド 吉原 ソープランド sod バイブ 風俗求人 高収入 都内 キャバクラ 全額日払い 無料動画 アダルトグッズ 大阪 風俗 大阪 風俗 神戸 風俗 裏DVD 裏DVD 風俗 求人 風俗 求人 デリヘル 新宿 デリヘル 東京

  • Michael Irvine 08/04/2009 9:29:00 PM

    I am not vehemently anti Pit Bull or anti dog. However if Pit bulls have "killed twice as many people as any other kind of dog" that is what is commonly referred to as "statistically relevant" information. If florida can ban the ownership of dangerous snakes, reptiles and spiders, then why not dangerous dogs? I am also constantly confused by the position taken by Pit Bull owners who seem to be more interested in finding a law to break than in owning and loving a dog. Get another breed of dog! The case of Melissa Moreira reminds me of a line from the Leonard Cohen song " Democracy is Coming to the USA". That people take on the task of fighting for the "rights" of a dog breed as if it were more important than the face of a little girl being ripped off... well as Leonard would say " we don't like children anyhow". Buy a Beagle.

  • Max 06/22/2009 10:16:00 PM

    This is the same procedure used by Nazis to get rid of those they did not want. We don't even know the true make up of humans with birth records and parents, how would you ever know the true breed of a dog or mutt?

  • SpayNeuter 06/03/2009 1:52:00 AM

    All this misinformation. The "National Canine Research Council" is one person, and she owns pit bulls. She spends her time trying to justify owning pits. A self published author because no respectable publishing house will handle her biased reports and books. And to cite other references that have been bought and paid for by the pit bull breeders/dog fighters doesn't lend much credibility to your arguments either. Wanna know how many attacks by pits made the headlines today, just today? Try FIFTEEN. Multiply that by 365 days a year to get an idea of why these dogs need to be regulated. PREVENT THE DEED, REGULATE THE BREED. Punishing the deed means someone has to suffer an attack first. Preventing the deed means saving a life. The question now is not how to save the pits, but rather how to save ourselves from the pits.

  • PetVet 05/24/2009 6:17:00 PM

    I wonder if the media or anyone else recognizes the irony that "only' 650 pit bulls died last year at the Miami shelter whereas thousands were killed each year at county shelters in Broward and Palm Beach counties where pit bulls are not banned. I fail to understand the purpose of importing more pit bulls into areas that are already killing so many local dogs. Rescue groups and adopters shun pit bulls as they focus on the cuter small breeds that are easier to find homes for. Thus, the pit bull is the breed most likely to die in most shelters. Breed bans may not be politically correct, but they may paradoxically decrease the killing of pit bulls. Many Florida shelters claim that up to half of their canine intake is pit bulls. It is clear that the breed's advocates have not been able to stop the carnage that affects pit bulls in virtually every Florida county.

  • Clay 05/23/2009 8:48:00 PM

    [quote]But why do so many idiots who shouldn't even have a hamster want a pit?[/quote] Why? Because they are heavily promoted by the Media as "bad a$$" dogs that only "criminals" have or would want which couldn`t be further from the truth. They don`t tell you about the Therapy Dogs http://ourpack.org/leo.html SAR dogs http://www.forpitssake.org/sar.html K9 detection dogs http://www.lawdogsusa.org/lawdogs.html Athletes http://www.pitbullunited.com/wallacethepitbull/ Titled Dogs http://www.badrap.org/rescue/hall_of_fame.cfm The Media and forum posters who get their "facts" from those Media Stories are selling them to EXACTLY the people who shouldn`t own them or ANY dog for that matter. Start telling the truth Media and the dogs will be in good homes. http://server.inalbum.com/show/jodipreis/Message_to_the_Media2.html?296033009 The RIGHT people will want them. And the right people come in all colors,all races,all income levels,all neighborhoods,all professions. Stigmatizing the dogs by imposing Breed Bans has the opposite effect of what you think it does. Criminals don`t obey laws. There are existing laws to deal with criminal activity. These dogs don`t get to choose their owners unfortunately. Breed Bans ONLY affect responsible law abiding citizens who provide good homes and SHOULD own these dogs. Irresponsible owners who don`t leash? Enforce the leash laws! That`s pretty simple The Media will keep this up as long as they can. 'pit bull' sells and it`s easier to use these dogs to bring people to their sites than to hire real Reporters who can actually write about real news. Figure it out folks. Read Pit Bull Placebo http://nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/ncrc-publications/

  • Johnny Transistor 05/23/2009 7:20:00 PM

    I love dogs. The trouble is, most dog owners' idea of training their shinny new pets is to show them where to do their business and maybe come when called once in a while. Generally, dog owners are not in control of Spot. Watch when a model citizen takes a stroll with their pooch. Who is the master as Spot pulls his/her meal ticket from pillar to post? If a parent doesn't teach their child discipline, the rules of the road etc., things go south for the kid. Is it different for a dog because dog is god spelled backwards? I agree that a dog is man's best friend. But an untrained dog is a menace to society, the same as an unruly delinquent is a menace to society. I don't particularly like pit bulls because once they hit auto pilot all that gets their attention is, sad but true, an AK-47. Killing them in mass solves nothing. Having all dogs have mandatory government schooling, their shots and a license might make life better for us all. After all, we educate children. We advertise on TV that it is the right path to follow. Why not stop wasting bullets and make some extra loot by setting up training centers for dogs? Make them like grade 1 without the reading, writing and arithmetic. Johnny Transistor May 23, 2009

  • Troy 05/21/2009 6:10:00 PM

    I live in Broward County and have wondered why the ban never came to pass here (North of Miami/Dade). We have many problems with pits here. This article explains why it never came to pass and also why we have so many pits here (the exodus from Miami/Dade). I've met many well balanced pits. However, one commenter explains that it's not the breed or the dog, but the owner. I agree wholeheartedly. But why do so many idiots who shouldn't even have a hamster want a pit? The breed attracts the worst kind of irresponsible owners with tragic results. My Frenchie has been attacked twice by pits and I was bitten trying to protect him at a local dog park. The owners are lackadaisical about their responsibility (leaving the park before I can get their information). With a dog comes responsibility. Many owners of the most powerful breeds don't understand it is their responsibility to round out their dog's personality with exercise and socialization exercises at a very young age and throughout their dog's lives. Do I and my dogs have to pay for that? Hell no. It's not the pit's fault they are so powerful. It's the owner's fault that they don't understand the consequences of not controlling that power. So until ALL owners can be made responsible ALL pits should be banned and euthanized. And, yes . . I understand exactly what I'm saying. There are many irresponsible owners of many different breeds, but none with so tragic consequences as the pit bull.

  • 2PitbullsMommy 05/21/2009 6:07:00 PM

    A GREAT READ: A study conduced in 2006 by Dr. Scot E. Dowd, Ph.D. of the Matrix Canine Research Institute evaluated the temperaments of over 25,000 dogs of various breeds, including 1,136 dogs from the Pit Bull group and 469 American Pit Bull Terriers. The results of rigorous pass-fail temperament tests revealed that there is no statistically significant relationship between breed and temperament. Studies conducted by numerous municipalities that have adopted BSL confirm that this tactic does not improve public safety, and to make matters worse, it is extremely expensive to implement and enforce. For example, in 2003, the Vicious Animal Legislation Task Force was formed to study the effectiveness of the Prince George�s County, Maryland, pit bull ban. The Task Force estimated that the County spends more than a quarter-million dollars each year to enforce the ban and yet, according to a report to the County Council, public safety was not improved as a result of the ban. Moreover, of all of the transgressions that were committed by a dog or an owner, it was possible to address these using another, non-breed-specific portion of the Animal Control Code (e.g., vicious animal, nuisance animal, leash laws). Hence the Task Force recommended that the county repeal the ban. Not only is it statistically untrue that certain breeds of dogs are more dangerous than others, even if it were true, efforts to restrict or ban certain breeds are impossibly difficult to enforce. Physical appearance with dogs, much like with humans, is a highly inaccurate method for determining genetic history. The only way to know for sure if a dog is of a certain breed is to test his or her DNA. It�s hard to imagine towns implementing DNA testing to assess which individual dogs pass the �safe gene test.� Moreover, what standard of �purity� should be applied? Would a dog whose genetic composition is 50% of a so-called �dangerous� breed be considered �safe� or �dangerous.� Questions such as these expose the absurdity of the logic underpinning BSL. Addressing the Real Culprit Of the many problems associated with BSL, perhaps one of the most serious is that it distracts from the real cause of the problem, which is not certain breeds of dog, but rather irresponsible human �owners.� Injuries inflicted by dogs on humans or other animals occur for a variety of reasons but in most cases such incidences can be traced back to human misconduct. Dogs who are abused and treated aggressively by humans, as well as those who have been encouraged to be aggressive, are more likely to attack a human or another animal, irrespective of breed. Humans who fail to properly monitor their dog�s mobility also contribute to the risk of aggressive incidents, irrespective of a dog�s breed. Failure to sterilize also increases the risk of aggression, irrespective of breed. In other words, the issues that are associated with increased risk of aggression are largely tied to human actions (or inaction), once again, irrespective of breed. Prevention of incidents is best achieved by implementing licensing laws, leash laws, ordinances that outlaw organized dog fighting, and laws and ordinances that impose stiff fines and penalties upon humans who fail to appropriately manage their canine companions.

  • Mack 05/20/2009 4:48:00 AM

    [quote]Workers every month halt scores of animals' hearts with an overdose of barbiturates, then cart them en masse out the back door.[/quote] Wouldn`t it be more cost effective to halt the Political careers of the cold-hearted ******** who propose and defend these laws in spite of all the evidence? If they were voted in,they can certainly be voted out.

  • Someone 05/20/2009 3:25:00 AM

    FLOUT. They FLOUT the law. They do not FLAUNT it.

  • Clay 05/20/2009 2:15:00 AM

    No one credible supports Breed Specific Legislation. http://www.animalfarmfoundation.org/topic.php?id=5&topic=17 It does not work to reduce dog bites. Denver Colorado comes to mind. http://nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/in-your-state/colorado/ [quote]...The only county in Colorado with a breed ban, Denver has the highest rate of dog-related hospitalizations in the state![/quote] Even the CDC(themselves) http://nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/avma-cdc-2008-final.pdf and AVMA http://nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/avma-letter.pdf have released statements re the oft quoted CDC Study Italy has repealed their Ban http://www.lifeinitaly.com/node/4229 Netherlands has repealed their Ban http://www.torontohumanesociety.com/newsandevents/stories/2008/08-09v.asp UK is looking at new Legislation to replace the DDA(Breed Specific) which has not worked http://www.animalfarmfoundation.org/pdf/RSPCA_New.pdf Good Luck with your Challenge Maybe Miami-Dade will come to their senses by doing some simple readily available Research. You may win Miami-Dade but that doesn`t mean it`s the right thing to do or that it works to reduce dog bites. Just call Denver,Italy,the Netherlands,the UK and ask. Florida Info http://nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/in-your-state/florida/ It`s not a Breed Specific issue Miami-Dade. It`s not even a dog issue It`s an owner issue. Target people who are a problem regardless of what they own and leave good owners alone regardless of what they own. And educate,educate,educate. Time to stop blaming and killing innocent dogs.

 

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy