Get Out! Arizona and America Join Joe Arpaio in Rushing to Inquire: Are Your Papers in Order?

Editor's note: Following publication of this article, U.S. District Judge Susan R. Bolton enjoined the state of Arizona from enacting key provisions of state Senate Bill 1070. Though the law’s most dangerous sections were put on pause, pending the outcome of litigation, the remainder of the law goes into effect, as scheduled, Thursday, July 29. See the full story on Bolton’s ruling, and read her entire decision, here.


We in the Grand Canyon state salute, by statute, the howler monkeys in jingo trees.

Unable to regulate our border, unwilling to create a reasonable path to citizenship for the immigrants who labor in our place, Arizona law enforcement officially now undertakes to rid us of Mexicans.

Because of infamous Arizona Senate Bill 1070, which is scheduled to take effect on Thursday, July 29, the pretext of traffic stops will now initiate a search for residency papers, a practice at once abhorrent and also under consideration by as many as 20 other states.

The national terror of reconquista will now flood the streets and courts of Arizona.

The ACLU and the United States Justice Department are seeking an injunction to put SB 1070 on hold until the seven lawsuits pending can be addressed.

While lawyers cosseted in leathered briefs discuss the depth of the anti-Mexican deluge, the boots on the ground of this immigrant monsoon wear badges and guns.

If police officers were supermen, there would still be the matter of kryptonite; lawmen, however, like the rest of us, are human: The alarm doesn't go off, but the spouse does; calls get dropped, coffee gets spilled. And, every so often, officers' problems are the stuff of television drama.

Now, like Noah with his ark, the police will sort the brown in the automobile: "You two remain; you two go to Nogales."

Daniel Magos, once an immigrant, now a United States citizen, is one man who understands the divide in a cop's life.

Once, when one of Sheriff Joe Arpaio's men had a flat tire, Daniel stopped to help.

On another occasion, a deputy was adrift in a conversation with a Spanish-speaking immigrant in south Phoenix. The officer had trouble understanding or being understood. Daniel stepped forward and translated for Arpaio's man.

Nor has Magos hesitated in the face of danger.

In 2000, he saw a group of men attacking what he believed was a mojado, a wetback. Magos summoned a deputy. The lawman grabbed one of the belligerents, and as his compadres attempted to flee in a car, they tried to run over the deputy. The officer gave his prisoner to Daniel.

"You hold him for me," Magos recalled the deputy telling him.

The deputy then gave chase in his vehicle, and the pursuit ended only when those fleeing crashed their car. In the ensuing chaos, Daniel was left to his own devices. "I called the sheriff's department and asked: 'What will I do?'"

What Daniel Magos would do today, 10 years later, is walk away.

What changed?

Only this: Daniel and his wife, Eva, were recent victims of racial profiling.

Daniel and Eva were, if you will, ahead of their time, ahead of SB 1070. And herein lies a small story about what happens when we hunt Mexicans and Mexican Americans and Central Americans in our national hysteria over the brown-skinned people among us.

We hear so often that Senate Bill 1070, which demands that police — in the course of their enforcement responsibilities — question people about their citizenship, will frighten Latinos away from speaking up in domestic-abuse calls or in drug investigations or in gang probes.

Critics of SB 1070 characterize the victims of this racial profiling bill as a population caught up in some low-rent episode of Law & Order.

The caution that SB 1070 will make witnesses silent is true, as far as it goes.

But SB 1070 has a more insidious side.

The victims of racial profiling sacrificed to the nativist fears that spawned SB 1070 are just as likely to be upstanding American citizens, even Good Samaritans like Daniel Magos .

Keep this in mind as America rushes to inquire: Are your papers in order?


Born in 1945, Daniel Magos is soft-spoken, reserved, firm. Despite the run-in with a sheriff's deputy he and his wife suffered, his manner is dignified, not put-upon. He presents the sort of serenity you see upon the faces of victims portrayed on holy cards. Not to suggest Daniel is a saint — he's simply a good man and a better neighbor.

He met Eva in 1965, as a 20-year-old, at the American Legion, Post 41, in Phoenix. "I was sitting at a table by myself when she and another lady came over and asked if they could sit down. It was her friend's idea."

When he met Eva's family, he had one vivid impression: "Her father was quite strict . . . If you went out to dinner, you had to be back by 8 p.m."

Dances offered a little more leeway on time, so Eva and Daniel would visit the Calderone Ballroom on 16th Street and Buckeye Road. "Actually we went next door, to Nano's. The music and the people were different. There was a higher social status at Nano's."

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next Page >>
 
  • Roy Caswell 07/31/2010 7:24:00 PM

    As I read the article, I couldn't help but notice that over and over again the word "immigrant" was used without the preceding and highly appropriate "ILLEGAL". In fact it wasn't until the very end of the article that the word ILLEGAL appeared and then only as a reference to note that Michael Lacey apparently doesn't understand the meaning of the word. Please Mike, let me help you out here. ILLEGAL, according to Merriam-Webster is : "not according to or authorized by law". The definition of ILLEGAL immigration is: "the movement of people across national borders in a way that violates the immigration laws of the destination country. Illegal immigrants are also known as illegal aliens to differentiate them from LEGAL aliens. The issue at hand in Arizona as well as around the country has NOTHING to do with IMMIGRATION and EVERYTHING to do with ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. I have not spoken to s single person, anywhere, who has any objection what-so-ever to anyone who wants to become a citizen of the United States and who goes through the process the same way our grand parents and great-grandparents did - LEGALLY. The problems and the objections come from our government being unwilling to protect our national security and our sovereignty by securing our boarders and enforcing our laws. Now, unless you'd like to make the case that there should be NO borders ANYWHERE on the planet and that every state and nation on earth should do away with their individual governments in favor of a border-less one-world government, at some point there MUST be laws enforced controlling the LEGAL passage of peoples from one country to another. Laws to govern where they can go, how long they can stay, and what they can do while VISITING another country must exist, and must be enforced. For those who deliberately, willfully, and repeatedly violate those laws, there must be punishment. There must be consequences for illegal actions.

  • Valigator 07/30/2010 1:30:00 PM

    Its amazing how writers want to make a mink coat out of a Rats back. The writer wants to inflect that Americans who want to stop runaway infiltration into their country are "bad guys"..you can paint all the pretty stories you like about "illegals" but you must be prepared to write about the thousands of "ugly" stories they bring with them also. Its the "ugly stories" that Americans are fed up with. Liars can figure, figures dont lie, you cant continue to put a happy face on this situation and blame it on Americans who are "over it"

  • tanzer kalayci 07/29/2010 11:53:00 PM

    That Sheriff should be charged with being a terroist. He sure is doing to many people in that area in the pretext of law

  • Robert Berthaut 07/29/2010 11:50:00 PM

    Were the author of this article to come home and find me luxuriating on his couch, I don't think that his foremost concern would be the circumstances that drove me to trespass. Unquestionably, I'd be escorted from his home in a police car. Regardless of good character and unimpeachable intentions, an uninvited stranger in your home is likely to get less than a warm reception. Under current law, illegal immigrants are little better than trespassers and must be dealt with accordingly. If there is a problem with the law, have Congress change it. If not, then enforce it. Were I to intrude myself into another country sans permission, I'd be subject to penalties under its laws. Moreover, Mexico's immigration laws are far less benign than ours. Lastly, as for the ethnic profiling and violations of civil rights, these are issues best left for our courts. Without a doubt, there are too many overly aggressive and incompetent cops who need to be weeded out. Perhaps, the author of this article should have addressed why Arizona has developed the siege mentality from which it currently suffers. Let's remember that a selective immigration policy will allow good people to immigrate, filtering out the criminal element.

  • Eagledives 07/29/2010 8:01:00 AM

    This Arizona phenomenon is happening because of decades of neglect and bad policies from past administrations. But there is another historical fact that is even more important. For many decades the manufacturing plants that closed down in the USA went overseas to Asia. Ten times as many went compared to Central America's poor countries. US Politicians created this trade policies to allow US Corporations to open in Communist China while ignoring and neglecting the poor neighbors from Central America. The end result of this was the mass illegal migration of thousands of poor people looking for a better life from Mexico and other C. America countries. If all those jobs would have been given to the poor neighborhoods of Mexico, El Salvador, Honduras and Nicaragua, then there would never have been so many illegals in the US today. But of course there is an ingrained misconceptions and false opinion of spanish central america in the minds of most US Citizens, that they are inferior when compare to Asians. Well, America , you got what you voted for the last 40 years, bad immigration and trade policies and the results are now being felt. Keep helping the Communist Chinese to grow more wealthy while keeping us here in the USA more dependent on them. Very smart indeed!

  • Anatoly 07/28/2010 5:52:00 PM

    Nobody against Latino! This is against illegal aliens. Don't call them immigrants. We all are immigrants but with respect to the low. Legal Latino like all Americans against illegal. Yes, same racial profile will exist, like in case with Muslims (terrorism) or Russian(mafia)or Japanese after Pearl Harbor, but normal people understand. If our country need additional hands, those hands should be legally invited from any country, even from Mexico first, and treat them with full respect, and pay them proper salary. You try to protect not only illegals, but I believe the businesses who are making money on them. They pay for this action of protest.

 

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy