According to Alonzo's research, things were even worse in the East. "The following year, in North Carolina," she wrote, "farm officials set up a statewide hotline to fill crop and livestock jobs. Two calls were received."

Things have only gotten worse with anti-immigrant legislation.

In 2007, more than 90,000 migrants fled Oklahoma, causing a loss of $1.9 billion to the state's economy. Since passage of SB 1070, Arizona has shed 200,000 migrants, who fled to friendlier states.

Protesters rally in the wake of Senate Bill 1070.
William Westfall
Protesters rally in the wake of Senate Bill 1070.
Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer signs Senate Bill 1070.
Stephen Lemons
Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer signs Senate Bill 1070.

Agriculture is the largest sector in Georgia's economy, yet lawmakers passed stiff anti-immigrant legislation projected to cost the state $391 million in lost crops. The governor suggested that farmers hire ex-cons to work the fields. The ex-cons refused. More than 70 percent of Georgia's restaurants had labor shortages and lost, on average, $21,000 per eating establishment.

Last year, Alabama one-upped Arizona and passed a tougher, meaner anti-immigrant measure. Research at the University of Alabama said the state could lose up to $10.8 billion and 140,000 jobs. The governor demanded that the statehouse reconsider. Alabama legislators responded by making the law tougher.


Why, in the middle of a recession, would statehouses vote to cripple their economies by driving Mexicans to flee?

Why, with President Obama deporting more Latinos than at any time in the nation's history, would legislators demand that local cops inspect citizenship papers?

The inescapable answer: Race.

The guiding proponent of these statutes is Kris W. Kobach, who helped write SB 1070.

At the time, Kobach was senior counsel to the legal arm of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR).

In 1986, John Tanton, FAIR's founder, wrote: "As whites see their power and control over their lives declining, will they simply go quietly into the night? Or will there be an explosion?"

Not surprisingly, the Southern Poverty Law Center called FAIR a racially driven organization.

Alabama's copycat legislation was penned by State Sen. Scott Beason, who has called blacks "aborigines" and declared that when it came to immigration, folks ought to "empty the clip."

In Arizona, the bill drafted by Kobach was sponsored by then-State Sen. Russell Pearce.

In 2006, Pearce forwarded to his followers a screed he'd read titled "Who Rules America?" The essay took exception to race-mixing and a "world in which every voice proclaims the equality of races, the inerrant nature of the Jewish 'Holocaust' tale, the wickedness of attempting to halt the flood of non-White aliens pouring across our borders..."

The essay, which originated from a neo-Nazi newsletter, went on to ask: "And who are these all-powerful masters of the media?"

The answer was obvious: "As we shall see, to a very large extent they are Jews."

Eerily, the message Pearce forwarded to political supporters in 2006 foreshadowed coming bloodshed.

"On the other hand, a White racist — that is, any racially conscious White person who looks askance at miscegenation or at the rapidly darkening racial situation in America — is portrayed, at best, as a despicable bigot who is reviled by the other characters, or, at worst, as a dangerous psychopath who is fascinated by firearms and is a menace to all law abiding citizens...," read Pearce's send-along.

Last month, Pearce acolyte J.T. Ready slaughtered his girlfriend, her daughter and boyfriend, and a 16-month-old infant before turning the gun on himself.

Ready was a neo-Nazi who was photographed at white supremacist rallies in full National Socialist regalia. Following the passage of SB 1070, Ready formed an armed militia that hunted Mexicans in southern Arizona.

After the multiple homicides, Pearce tried to distance himself from Ready. This sleight of hand was complicated for Pearce: He'd endorsed Ready's failed run for the Mesa City Council, and, in fact, had ordained Ready into the priesthood of the Mormon faith and attended his baptism.

These, then, are the miscreants who have stirred this nation's darkest prejudices.

None of this was grist in the Supreme Court. The Obama administration opted to argue only the narrowest of issues: State immigration laws trampled federal domain. With an election looming, the president chose not to confront nativist anxiety.

Latino groups and civil rights organizations have filed lawsuits that challenge what Obama ducked. These suits recount what happens on American streets when brown people are detained, when Mexicans and Central Americans are crowded into detention centers, when families are ripped apart.

When law enforcement cordons off brown communities, the law, as applied, is apartheid.

Perhaps you can understand, after a wave of hateful legislation and a galling discussion by justices and attorneys in the country's highest court, that there are those not content with jurisprudence.

You see, all this legal eloquence comes after generations of families picked crops on their way to citizenship, only to encounter lawyers and lawmakers who are worse than any field boss.

Monica Alonzo's father crossed the border from Mexico. His family worked in the cotton fields. They earned less, picked more, and kept their mouths shut. Kids in school were slapped if they were overheard speaking Spanish.

"They mistreated the Mexicans the worst in El Mirage," says Alonzo. "Mexicans went straight to jail or were roughed up for minor offenses. They were made to feel like worthless people. Many Mexicans instilled in their children the importance of speaking only English. Not in my house. For my father, the treatment created a lot of resentment towards whites. We weren't allowed to speak English at home for some time. We would get in trouble if he knew we were mixing with the Anglos."

« Previous Page
 |
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
All
 
Next Page »
 
My Voice Nation Help
9 comments
stand up!
stand up!

That whole "brown" thing may have worked 10 years ago but not now. What is the crime like in the lawless countries that they are from. We, Americans have laws to prevent us for becoming like you! Abide by them or leave!

FQS9000
FQS9000

Why did the Congress pass such nasty immigration laws?  Because the unions did not want competition. All immigration laws should be repealed by Congress.  Anyone should be able to enter the US if they are not either wanted by the law or a felon. The current laws are a union/Democrap abomination.

JoeMamma
JoeMamma

Calling an illegal alien an undocumented worker, is like calling a drug dealer, and unlicensed pharmacist. illegal is illegal.  its time to secure the borders and kick out those that do not belong and cost us money. the only reason the Democrats don't want to do this, is they see them as voters for their cause.

George Fuller
George Fuller

Children are dual citizens.....their is no reason they can't stay with their parents......

George Fuller
George Fuller

It must be a slow news day........drag out another hearts and flowers story........

Morris Victor
Morris Victor

if this truly was about illegal immigration...there are many europeans who are here illegally..folk from india here illegally...china...japan..russia..where is the backlash against them?...ohhh...not brown..nevermind...

Jay
Jay

As someone who is Brown (Chilean) and a legal US citizen, I personally think we havent done enough to stop Illegals. I would gladly show my papers, what do I have to worry about? Really pisses me off when the liberal media tries to make it a racism thing when it is about national security and providing more opportunities for employment for legal citizens.  

Susan
Susan

The war on Mexicans isn't a war on Mexicans; rather, it is a war against illegal aliens, no matter where they snuck into this country from.  Why shouldn't they (anyone whose identity is in doubt) be asked for documentation that they belong in this country?  When we go to the library, bank, motor vehicle office, supermarket, etc., we are asked for identification and we show it, without feeling we are being discriminated against.  We don't need the Supreme Court to rule on whether it's right or wrong - it's for everyone's protection.  If you can't prove you are an American citizen, then you should be deported back where you are a citizen.

 
Loading...