D'Artagnan Fed Public Deceptive Foie Gras Claims, Now Has To Eat Its Words

Farm Sanctuary

National Advertising Division (NAD) of the Council of Better Business

Bureaus earlier this week recommended that D'Artagnan Inc. discontinue

certain advertising claims regarding its Artisan foie gras --

specifically that "the liver is not diseased, simply enlarged", and

that the animals are hand-raised "under the strictest of animal care

standards." NAD's inquiry found that the former claim had not been

adequately substantiated, and that the latter is not only inconsistent

with the evidence in the record, but not supported by any evidence

provided by D'Artagnan. (Farm Sanctuary's No Foie Gras Campaign

has compiled copious documentation from leading avian veterinarians

explaining how foie gras production causes ducks and geese to contract

a fatty liver disease known as "hepatic lipidosis".)

Following a challenge by the Humane Society of the United States, NAD

underwent a lengthy review of Internet advertising for the product. As

a self-regulatory forum of the advertising industry, NAD does not take

a position on what constitutes humane treatment of animals or other

ethical considerations associated with foie gras production. Yet NAD

also recognized that consumers cannot typically verify the accuracy of

animal welfare practices for themselves, and that its role therefore

included the study of relevant scientific evidence and consumer

expectations to ensure that the advertising was not misleading. After

doing so, NAD found that the claims were indeed misleading, and

recommended that D'Artagnan discontinue them. D'Artagnan issued a

statement saying that it "strongly disagrees with NAD's decision but

nonetheless will comply and modify its advertising." How ironic that

this decision is being forced down D'Artagnan's throat.

Miami's local chefs weighed in on the issue of foie gras in our 2006 feature story Foie Wars.

Now, two-and-a-half years later, it is interesting to note that only

Giancarla Bodoni of Escopazzo has stuck to her words and kept foie gras

off her menu. Others, such as Michelle Bernstein, Jonathan Eismann, and

Johnny Vinczencz, each professed to be wrestling with their conscience

over the ethical implications of force-feeding animals, but have

continued to serve foie gras in their respective restaurants.

Apparently they concluded that torture is bad, but a $25 appetizer is a

$25 appetizer.  

Sponsor Content


All-access pass to the top stories, events and offers around town.

  • Top Stories


All-access pass to top stories, events and offers around town.

Sign Up >

No Thanks!

Remind Me Later >