I know that, unlike many directors, you read a lot of film criticism.
Film criticism is in a strange place. Talk about 17 years later! I could never have imagined that print film reviewing would be dying. Its unfathomable to me. I dont like reading film criticism on a laptop. I like holding it in my hand.
Youre a geezer, Quentin.
Exactly. It seems to me from reading a lot of the film criticism that came out of Cannes this year that the few print critics that are left writing are so busy combating these Internet bozos that theres a new formalism, a new self-seriousness among remaining critics, to prove theyre professionals. Even some of the younger critics who are still writing in printwell, theyre not that youngare coming across like young fogies. There are some good online critics, but then there are these fanboy types: Ooh, this sucks balls. Its a little bit like 78, 79, 80, where exuberance in filmmaking is not getting its due anymore. For example, The Blues Brothers never got any respect. Now, it truly is beloved, as it goddamn well should be. I mean, its sad to think of what happened to John Landis after An American Werewolf in London, but in those two movies, he was the first fanboy director making movies out of his head.
I feel very lucky to live the life of an artist in this town, in this industry. I have no intention of ever being a director for hire. I just started guiding myself as things have gone on. One of the huge lessons I learned is that these writer-directors come out, and their films are idiosyncraticthey have a special voice and those first two movies are like that. But its hard work to go back to a blank page, to start from scratch every single, solitary time and make a great movie every time. There are exceptions. Woody Allen is one of them.
Not necessarily for the better.
I think hes in a renaissance, except for Melinda and Melinda I loved Anything Else. But its much easier [for a director] to say, What scripts are out there? Either they buy it and rewrite it, or they work with a writer. And they get more movies made. Thats all well and good, but cut to 10 years down the pike, and all of a sudden, they dont have that voice anymore. Theyre sucking dick for the Man. Im not interested in just doing a job or working with this actor just to work with them. I learned something after I did Jackie Brownand dont get me wrong, I love Jackie Brown. But when it was all overeven when I was making itthe fact that it was just a little bit once removed made me a little bit disconnected from it. Thats why I havent done another adaptation since then. I want to naturally fall into the next thing thats going to turn me on.
Is there pressure on you to work more often?
No. I mean I dont want another six-year gap like what happened between Jackie Brown and Kill Bill. I make a movie every year and a half, two years. When I finish, I take six months of doing nothing, and thats great. But you can live life while youre writing. Its a fun life, actually, cause Im working and committed and passionate, but I go out and see friends. When Im making a movie, the world goes away and Im on Mt. Everest. Obama is President? Who cares? Im making my movie.