Scott’s proposal, which must be approved by the Legislature and is currently being heard by the Senate Committee on Regulated Industries, expands gambling not just for the tribe but for select other operators. In addition to letting the Seminoles offer roulette and craps (they now have just
If no new compact is reached, the state will try to stop the blackjack and card games the Seminoles currently run, but the Seminoles will fight to keep them. Both sides have filed lawsuits, so the issue will be duked out in court.
Here are seven keys to understanding what's happening:
1. Any move to change gambling regulations in the state is always complicated, essentially a five-way puzzle that must please the following stakeholders:
- The Seminoles, who led the movement for tribes to operate casinos on sovereign land and want to protect their own interests.
- The pari-mutuels, i.e., the racetrack casinos (sometimes called racinos), meaning jai-alai frontons, horse tracks, and dog tracks. Law requires them to offer racing to be able to offer slots. (Side note: Many see animal racing as cruel and outdated and hope for "decoupling" so that betting can continue without the animals.) They cry that they want equality or parity with the tribes.
which is looking to fill its coffers. state,
- North Florida racetracks, which claim they are disadvantaged because only Broward and Miami-Dade are allowed slots, per a constitutional amendment passed by voters in 2004.
- Gambling opponents, or people morally opposed to gambling on the grounds that it takes advantage of the poor and functions essentially as a regressive tax.
- The pari-mutuels are complaining that the Seminoles get too much.
- Those opposed to gambling say it expands gambling too much.
- Some northern counties complain that they are being cut out of the opportunity to have slots.
The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, established in 1988, helped set a path for how tribes and states work out gambling. IGRA states that tribes can offer the same games that the rest of the area can offer, without paying taxes. The only way the state can garner money from the tribe is to allow something above and beyond the norm. And the federal government must approve such agreements, called compacts, to ensure they are on the up and up. That’s why those crying for a “level playing field” will never get it. All they can hope for is a more level playing field.
4. The Seminoles make the most money from their casino in Tampa.
You think the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel & Casino in Hollywood does big business? Go to the Hard Rock in Tampa, which has no competition. With the next-closest slots location being the Seminoles’ own casino in Immokalee, the Tampa monstrosity is the fourth-largest casino in the United States, where revenues surpass $880 million per year. The Hollywood Hard Rock, with two other Seminole casinos and the pari-mutuels nibbling at business, makes "only" about $550 million. Tampa is the Seminoles' true cash cow. That's why they don't want competition in North or Central Florida.
5. The Seminoles didn't propose expansion beyond their craps and roulette; the state did.
Critics of Scott's proposed compact blame the Seminoles for the expansions of gambling that are built into it, but Seminole Gaming CEO James Allen pointed out at a conference earlier this month that the tribe’s offer was $3 billion, and in exchange it only asked for adding craps and roulette at its sites. "The Seminole tribe is not a proponent of this perceived huge expansion in the state," Allen said. It was Gov. Scott and state legislators who threw in some other details — permitting blackjack in South Florida, slots in Palm Beach County, etc. (though those will have to be approved via a separate bill) — so that they could appease other parties and cobble together enough support to pass the compact.
6. Genting is still in play.
That clause about “one more gambling permit in Miami-Dade”? That will go up for bid, and some wags are suggesting that’s a way for Genting Group, the Malaysian gambling giant that bought the Miami Herald's famous property on Biscayne Bay, to still get into the game. In 2011, Genting bought the Herald building and planned to build a massive resort and casino. Those plans were ditched, though, after lawmakers refused to rewrite gambling laws, and the company hasn't disclosed alternate plans for the site. Speculators figured that the company was holding out hope that laws would change in its favor. But even if the compact were to pass and Genting wins a permit to operate, don’t look for that giant structure the company first proposed. The bill cites a 750-slot limit. That’s about what the racinos in South Florida offer.
7. If a Gretna court case goes through, this all could be moot.
The Florida Supreme Court is hearing a case in July that could puncture this whole thing. Gretna Racing, based in upper northwest Florida, is arguing that it should be allowed to have slots because local voters approved it via a referendum. They point to language in a bill that carved out slots for Hialeah Park, which was not one of the original racetrack casinos approved for slots in 2008. If Gretna gets slots, five other Florida counties that also approved referenda also would have copycat suits — and that sure would wipe out the Seminoles’ exclusivity outside of South Florida. The compact would blow up, and legislators and Scott would have to go back to the drawing board.
For more gambling news, visit SouthFloridaGambling.com.